I love books. Here I give my opinion on some of the books I've read. I mostly read nonfiction.
I'm always looking for book recommendations - if you have any comment or suggestion, please get in touch with me! If you agree or disagree with my comments, I would also love to hear about it. These small texts are an invitation to discuss the content of the books.
Stoner, by John Williams (1965)
I never liked the saying that 'every rule has an exception', but if my implicit rule of reporting about non fiction books needs to be broken by a piece of fiction, that must be 'Stoner' by John Williams.
This novel is *unbelievable*. Really. The characters are of such depth... they It really left a footprint in my memory - I remember some of the characters as if I had met them, and draw "lessons of life" from them.
Articles appears periodically in newspapers with readers who have discovered this novel. They are as astounded by its quality as by its lack of fame. It has gone fairly unnoticed for the general public, yet it is so great.... I recommend it wholeheartedly.
(April 2021 - read around 2019)
I am a strange loop, Douglas Hofstadter (2007)
Very inspiring and profound. It explains the main thesis of GEB in a much more central and clear way: that the self or 'I' arises from a strange loop of causal levels in our brain.
If you were fascinated by GEB, but perhaps didn't fully understand its main message, you will enjoy 'I am a strange loop'.
(April 2021 - read around 2010)
Gödel, Escher, Bach - an Eternal Golden Braid, by Douglas Hofstadter (1979)
As for many, my fascination for undecidability started with GEB. In my opinion, this book is both deep and truly interdisciplinary (apart from really fascinating). The main thesis of the book is that Gödel's proof, Escher's paintings and Bach's music share a common structure - a ¨"strange loop" or tangled hierarchy - and that this structure is the key to understanding consciousness or the emergence of an 'I'. While I feel that the first statement is usually appreciated, my impression is that the second has gone largely unnoticed. Indeed, Hofstadter complains in the preface to the 20th anniversary edition that his thesis for consciousness has not been taken seriously in academic circles - and he subsequently wrote the much clearer "I am a strange loop" (2007) making this point. I believe that this is due to the presentation of the book - while truly fascinating, this message about consciousness is buried somewhere in the pages 700+.
As a side remark, I have a very high opinion of Pulitzer Prize Winners for General Nonfiction - both GEB and "Guns, germs and steel" (by Jared Diamond) won it.
(March 2021 ; read around 2008)
A new kind of science, by Stephen Wolfram (2002)
This book is something quite unique - I've never encountered anything like it. On the one hand, it presents a remarkable range of numerical experiments with cellular automata and variations thereof, with which it investigates phenomena in biology, fundamental physics, perception, the foundations of mathematics... On the other hand, it barely cites previous work (e.g. Turing's), it does not formulate a single theorem, and most importantly, the claims on the importance of his discoveries are so grandiose that they become preposterous and simply unreadable. It's such a pity. But looking at the figures and captions of the book is well worthwhile.
In the book, Wolfram proposes the "Principle of Computational Equivalence", which is very similar to my principle "Universality everywhere". I will soon spell out their similarities.
(March 2021; read around 2012)
The Second World War, by Winston Churchill (1959)
This book is unbelievable. I guess it's in my top 5 or 10 of all times.
The book is remarkable for at least 3 reasons: 1) it is superbly written - Churchill was famous for his oratory and writing skills -, 2) the story of World War II supersedes any imaginable fiction - the world became, very tragically, a war theatre -, and 3) a version of the story is written by a major player - e.g. Churchill reproduces many of his telegrams with Roosevelt, explains his impressions of Petain, De Gaulle, Stalin, Truman, his opinions of Chamberlain...
There are two notable omissions in the book. First, the Holocaust, or any reference to that immense tragedy. Second, the fact that the battle of the Atlantic (against the U-boots) was won largely because they cracked the Nazi encryption systems with Engima - this was still classified when the book was published.
The book - roughly 1000 pages - is an abridgement by Denis Kelly of the original 6 volumes written by Churchill - entitled The Gathering Storm (1919 - May 1940), Their Finest Hour (1940), The Grand Alliance (1941), The Hinge of Fate (1942 - July 1943), Closing the Ring (July 1943 - June 1944) and Triumph and Tragedy (June 1944 - July 1945).
Did you know that Churchill won the Nobel Prize in literature?
(March 2021; read around 2012)
The atoms of language, by Mark C. Baker (2001)
It's a good book. It presents the parameters & principles theory of language clearly. The analogy with chemistry (that the parameters in grammar are like the atoms in chemistry) is good, but a little too repetitive for my taste. Very accessible and recommendable.
Unification grammars, by Nissim Francez and Shuly Wintner (2012)
This book is amazing. Super insightful and clearly written. It's a textbook, not a popular science book. It presents a formalism to describe grammars of formal languages (easy) and natural languages (hard), and then shows how to map them to a so-called unification grammar. My best discovery in a long time.
Writing and script - A very short introduction, by Andrew Robinson (2009)
An excellent example of what a "very short introduction" should be, in my opinion. Super interesting and insightful, where one learns both concepts and examples of scripts. Great fun. Highly recommendable.
Linguistics - A very short introduction, by P. H. Matthews (2003)
I didn't enjoy this book very much. I found that many of the explanations were either shallow or obvious. I also found the examples somewhat parochial (too centred on the English culture / language) and implicitly sexist, or at least not being aware language's implicit sexism.
Languages - A very short introduction, by Stephen R. Anderson (2012)
This book is centred around the question "How many languages are there in the world?" I found the question somewhat artificial - it seems obvious to me that it is difficult to define the boundaries of a language, i.e. to define what one language is. The book dwells on the analogy between languages and species in biology, which is useful and insightful. Overall it's a good book.
Logic - A very short introduction, by Graham Priest (2000)
This book is stunning! It's truly remarkable how Priest explains really basic concepts in logic and immediately applies them to very old philosophical problems: the Cosmological Argument (logically ambiguous), the Ontological Argument (it has a void subject), the Argument of Design (false), Fatalism... It even talks about self-reference and Gödel! For me this is a masterpiece of a ¨¨"very short introduction"!
Kant and the platypus - Essays on language and cognition, by Umberto Eco (1997)
This book ¨¨"touched my heart". Really - it made me cry and shiver.
When Marco Polo got to present-day Indonesia, he saw a rhino for the first time. He called it a unicorn, because it had a single horn. But it was so dirty, earthly, non perfect... in summary, so different from the idealised unicorn he had imagined! Why did he call it a unicorn nonetheless? This is one of the questions that semiotics studies.
One can similarly imagine what Kant (or Peirce) would have thought if they had seen a platypus...
Wonderful, really deep, and accessible book. What else can I say? (March 2021)